About ChoiceIQ

Independent intelligence for smarter competition choices.

ChoiceIQ brings competitions from multiple operators into one place, turns public information into consistent scores and helps people understand what they are considering before they enter.

Why we exist

The market is busy. The information is fragmented.

Prize competitions can be difficult to compare. Prices, ticket supplies, draw formats, cash alternatives and operator information are often presented differently across dozens of websites.

ChoiceIQ was created to make that information easier to understand. We collect available competition data, organise it into a common format and apply a consistent scoring methodology. The result is a clearer view of both the competition and the operator behind it.

We do not tell people that they will win. We give them better information with which to make their own decision.

Two layers of intelligence

We assess the offer and the organisation behind it.

Competition level

ChoiceIQ Score

100

A comparative view of an individual competition using five weighted criteria.

30

Value for money

How the entry price compares with the prize and competition structure.

25

Available odds

Ticket supply and participation data where the operator makes it available.

20

Operator confidence

The confidence signals behind the company running the competition.

15

Transparency

How clearly the important terms, dates, limits and prize details are presented.

10

Entry flexibility

Entry limits, free-entry information and other ways the competition can be entered.

Operator level

Confidence Score

100

An evidence-led assessment of business identity, transparency, draw practices, player safeguards and operating history.

Business verification

15 points

Competition transparency

25 points

Draw integrity and prizes

25 points

Player protection

20 points

Track record and service

15 points

Our principles

How we approach trust.

ChoiceIQ is designed to make its reasoning visible. Scores should be useful, but the evidence behind them matters just as much.

01

Evidence before opinion

We distinguish between information we can verify, information supplied by an operator and information that is not yet available.

02

Consistent comparisons

The same core criteria are applied across competitions so users can make more meaningful comparisons.

03

Clear limitations

A ChoiceIQ score is comparative information. It is not a promise of quality, legality or a future win.

04

Responsible participation

Competitions should be optional entertainment. Nobody should enter with money they cannot afford to lose.

What independence means

The score must remain separate from operator influence.

Commercial separation

Commercial and affiliate relationships do not influence ChoiceIQ scores, rankings or operator assessments. The same published methodology applies to every operator.

Corrections are welcome

Operators can provide evidence or correct factual errors, but the assessment remains ChoiceIQ’s.

Missing data stays visible

Where information cannot be verified, we label it clearly instead of filling the gap with an assumption.

Methodology evolves openly

As the market develops, scoring criteria can be refined and material changes should be explained.

A responsible reminder

Competition entry is entertainment, not a financial strategy.

Every entry can lose. A high ChoiceIQ score does not predict a winner and an operator score does not guarantee the outcome of a draw. Always review the full operator terms, set a personal limit and never spend money needed for essentials.

Explore ChoiceIQ

Compare with more confidence.

See live competition scores, operator assessments and market-level intelligence in one place.

Explore Live Competitions